#MustRead Shares (weekly)

  • tags: brands responsibility #MustRead

  • tags: learning changing leadership #MustRead Brainfood

  • tags: school reform business-education partnership #MustRead

  • tags: school model unschooling #MustRead

  • tags: design innovation #MustRead

  • tags: blueprint malaysia schools of the future future of schools #MustRead 21C

    • Wave 1 (2012-2015) focusing on efforts to turn around the system by supporting teachers and focusing on core skills
    • education transformation is to take place over 13 years
    • Wave 2 (2016-2020) on accelerating system improvement
    • Wave 3 (2021-2025) on moving towards excellence with increased operational flexibility.
    • access, quality, equity, unity and efficiency.
    • six key attributes that will enable them to be globally competitive
    • knowledge, thinking skills, leadership skills, bilingual proficiency, ethics and spirituality, as well as national identity.
      • Reminds me of Gardner’s Five Minds for the Future
    • 1. Provide equal access to quality education of an international standard.

    • 2. Ensure every child is proficient in Bahasa Malaysia and English language.

    • 3. Develop values-driven Malaysians.

    • 4. Transform teaching into the profession of choice.

    • 5. Ensure high-performing school leaders in every school.

    • 6. Empower State Education Departments, District Education Offices and schools to customise solutions based on need.

    • 7. Leverage information and communication technology to scale up quality learning across Malaysia.

    • 8. Transform ministry delivery capabilities and capacity.

    • 9. Partner with parents, community and private sector at scale.

    • 10. Maximise student outcomes for every ringgit.

    • 11. Increase transparency for direct public accountability.

    • Over the course of a year, over 50,000 ministry officials, teachers, principals, parents, students and members of the public across Malaysia were engaged via interviews, focus groups, surveys, and National Dialogue townhall and roundtable discussions.
  • Our students want to become innovators. Our economy needs them to become innovators. The question is: As educators, do we have the courage to disrupt conventional wisdom and pursue the innovations that matter most?

    Third, to push educational innovation, districts need to partner with one another, businesses, and nonprofits to establish true R&D labs—schools of choice that are developing 21st-century approaches to learning.

    tags: education innovation schools of the future future of schools school model UnbouBrainFood #MustRead Brainfood

    • need to develop ways to assess essential skills with digital portfolios that follow students through school
    • assess teachers’ effectiveness by analysis of their students’ work, rather than on the basis of a test score. Teachers and administrators should also build digital portfolios
    • Third, to push educational innovation, districts need to partner with one another, businesses, and nonprofits to establish true R&D labs—schools of choice that are developing 21st-century approaches to learning.
    • we need to incorporate a better understanding of how students are motivated to do their best work into our course and school designs. Google has a 20 percent rule, whereby all employees have the equivalent of one day a week to work on any project they choose. These projects have produced many of Google’s most important innovations. I would like to see this same rule applied to every classroom in America, as a way to create time for students to pursue their own interests and continue to develop their sense of play, passion, and purpose.
    • Our students want to become innovators. Our economy needs them to become innovators. The question is: As educators, do we have the courage to disrupt conventional wisdom and pursue the innovations that matter most?
  • tags: innovation colorado academy school model EdJourney #MustRead

  • Dewey: “The world in which most of us live is a world in which everyone has a calling and occupation, something to do,” he wrote. “Some are managers and others are subordinates. But the great thing for one as for the other is that each shall have had the education which enables him to see within his daily work all there is in it of large and human significance.”

    tags: education learning freedom Dewey edreform purpose of education #MustRead

    • From this narrow, instrumentalist perspective, students are consumers buying a customized playlist of knowledge
    • philosopher John Dewey, America’s most influential thinker on education, opposed this effort. Though he was open to integrating manual training in school curriculums, Dewey opposed the dual-track system because he recognized that it would reinforce the inequalities of his time. Wouldn’t such a system have the same result today?
    • Education should aim to enhance our capacities, Dewey argued, so that we are not reduced to mere tools.
    • Dewey had a different vision. Given the pace of change, it is impossible (he noted in 1897) to know what the world will be like in a couple of decades, so schools first and foremost should teach us habits of learning.
    • awareness of our interdependence
    • “The inclination to learn from life itself and to make the conditions of life such that all will learn in the process of living is the finest product of schooling.”
    • The inclination to learn from life can be taught in a liberal arts curriculum, but also in schools that focus on real-world skills, from engineering to nursing. The key is to develop habits of mind that allow students to keep learning, even as they acquire skills to get things done. This combination will serve students as individuals, family members and citizens — not just as employees and managers.
      • Yes, the “key is to develop habits of mind that allow students to keep learning.” However, the type of learning for the future is more expansive than the brand of learning provided in many schools. 
    • Dewey’s insight that learning in the process of living is the deepest form of freedom
    • In a nation that aspires to democracy, that’s what education is primarily for: the cultivation of freedom within society
    • higher education’s highest purpose is to give all citizens the opportunity to find “large and human significance” in their lives and work.
      • Are we? Are we giving all citizens the opportunity to find large and human significance in their lives and work?
  • tags: nytimes com friedman edreform #MustRead

  • tags: edreform ActionEd future of schools curriculum #MustRead Brainfood

Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

PROCESS POST: Pushing my thinking evolution about master planning in education and schools

Campus master plans are beautiful, elegant solutions. They make visible entire systems of complex thinking. Is there any comparable practice in schools when it comes to “pedagogical master planning” or “instructional systems thinking?” I don’t think strategic planning is even remotely comparable given the manner in which it is most commonly done. Isn’t that fascinating? We spend enormous time, energy, and resources on physical-space planning, yet we don’t really do such with the core of what really exists at the center of learning in schools.

Can you show a visitor your “pedagogical master plan” if she asked to see it…like you could a campus master plan? Could you point to the system of blueprints, engineering details, and relational diagrams?

On the University of Buffalo’s “Building_UB Photostream” on Flickr, you can see in their campus master plan the thoughtful planning that undergirds all of the eventual blueprinting, engineering, and constructing. You can see sets of plans that provide intentional detail about how buildings will relate to one another by function and geography. You can see green-space drawings and bubble diagrams that reveal why various operations are grouped and coordinated in particular ways. You can see the whole…and all of the virtually countless parts.

by Building_UB, Flickr, Creative Commons License

Of course, after such thorough master planning is completed, the “real work” is only just beginning. Renovation schedules must be developed and articulated. Architectural blueprints and renderings must be created. Engineering schema must be decided – water, electrical, gas, flooring, lighting, etc. FF&E (furniture, fixtures, and equipment) must be selected. And, if done well, ALL of those countless decisions radiate from the uber planning – the campus master plans. It just has that “this-makes-sense” kind of feeling.

Do schools have anything comparable in terms of planning and implementation for the overall system of instruction and pedagogy that should exist at the heart of any and all educational organizations?

Schools seem to be making countless decisions…

  • Technology – laptops, tablets, Apple, PC, BYOD/BYOT, interactive white boards, student information systems, social media, etc.
  • Methods – lecture, experiential, PBL, CBL, DBL, flipped classrooms, discovery, inquiry, Socratic, etc.
  • Content – math (algebra, calculus, statistics), English, history, science (physics first?), what world languages?, advisement, PE,…what about anthropology, psychology, biomechanical engineering, wood working, metallurgy, etc.
  • Assessment – grades, standards-based, zeros, averaging, mastery, rubrics (how many levels?), standardized testing, authentic and performance-based, etc.
  • Professional development – conferences, PLCs, Critical Friends Groups, portfolios, in-service, FedEx days, task forces, etc.
  • Learning spaces – …
  • Skills – …
  • [And the list goes on.]

Are we developing master plans that make visible the links, connections, relationships, influences, and impacts that each of these “buildings” has on the other “buildings” on campus? Are we designing the architectural blueprints and engineering blow-ups that show each and every one of these categorical constructs working and existing in harmonious symphony with the other interrelated elements?

Can you show me such plans? Can you show me how a decision to implement PBL – just one pedagogical methodology – impacts the ripple-decisions of technology, professional development, assessment, learning spaces, etc.?

The system is a whole. It reminds me of the song about the ankle bone connected to the shin bone, the shin bone connected to the knee bone, the knee bone connected to the thigh bone,….

I wonder what would happen on a school campus if a small group of builders just squatted on a section of property and began building. What if this “rogue” group sawed, hammered, and nailed their creation without much coordination with the campus master plan. Not from spite or rebellion. Just from lack of clarity and collective connectedness.

Such happens every day in the pedagogical and instructional system of a school. Lots of independent contractors not having the level of master plans to which they have contributed and from which they can coordinate.

[out of writing time for now.]

Denver – @GrantLichtman #EdJourney, episode 2 – 9.13.12

In the first chapter of The Falconer – a chapter interestingly titled “Step -1: Who Do I Want to Be?” – Lichtman concludes the chapter as follows:

We all have heroes. They are people who we perceive are somehow better than we are. We want to be like them. They provide for us a template of how we can feel happy and proud that we had a life on this earth. They are not perfect by any means, but they have particular characteristics that we want to combine and emulate….We take the pieces and ask the question, often without knowing it: how can I come closer to each of their strengths and avoid each of their weaknesses?

Without sacrificing our concept of self, the templates of our heroes can help us know, concretely, where we want to go. Whether we admit it or not, knowing where we want to go is always the first step in a journey.

Do you know who you want to be as a school? Who are your school heroes? Your educational heroes? Your learning heroes?

Do you know where you want to go on your journey to become a better school? Are you constructing detailed plans to decipher and determine your paths as a school community?

Grant Lichtman spent his week in Denver, CO. He shared time, stories, and practices with four different schools. Lessons from these examples can help us know better who we are as a learning community. Lessons from Grant’s travels can reveal the school heroes we want to emulate.

What form of leadership will you employ at your school? In what ways will you facilitate students interacting with the “real world?” How might you experiment with various methods and approaches? Grant’s waypoints in Denver can provide great touchstones on which to reflect and plan your own journey.

Tune into Grant’s individual posts from his first week on the road for #EdJourney…

courtesy of Steve Goldberg

Image from Google Earth courtesy of Steve Goldberg (@SteveG_TLC).

Ed Zed Omegas: High School Dropouts Band Together to Learn

Six disenchanted young people have dropped out of high school, hooked up with a guidance counselor, and banded together to study the education issue into which they have plunged. And they are crowd sourcing their learning about the deep dive on high-school alternatives. We can follow along with their blogs, their collective site, their tweets. We can even watch on public television.

Check this out…

And then, be sure to read here

Fascinating!

[Thanks to Chuck Reece for putting me onto Zed Omega.]

Disruption, GOOD #FutureLearning

In “Graduating All Students Innovation-Ready,” Tony Wagner ended his piece with this question about courage:

Our students want to become innovators. Our economy needs them to become innovators. The question is: As educators, do we have the courage to disrupt conventional wisdom and pursue the innovations that matter most?

Recently, GOOD published a piece about a few of the disruptors – those who are pushing us to consider the bigger possible (r)evolutions in education. It’s great material for a bit of optimistic brain stretching…


Future Learning Short Documentary (12:50)

More about the film
GOOD Video: How Do We Make Learning Relevant to Students?

[Thanks to Govantez Lowndes for putting me onto the documentary on GOOD. I had missed it.]