Unknown's avatar

About boadams1

Learner. Husband. Dad. Mountaineer. Head of School at Mackintosh Academy - Boulder, in Boulder, Colorado. Have worked in transformation design, educational innovation, and school leadership for 30+ years.

Pedagogical Master Planning – the beginnings of a major study and implementation

Today, I continued to explore and research the idea of master planning in schools. I am particularly interested in processing through complex thoughts about the purposeful design and architecture of school pedagogy. Here are a few of my take-aways from today’s research:

1. Googling “campus master planning” and “pedagogical master planning” (and some related search strings) resulted in about 3:1 results for campus master planning. In fact, I think the ratio is skewed. Many of the finds in “pedagogical master planning” turned out to be campus master plans when I searched the links more deeply. None of the links I explored in “campus master planning” turned out to be pedagogical master planning hidden in the gross results. Does this imply that we are at least three times more committed to planning the physical campus than we are to planning the pedagogical campus? [Please forgive my crude statistical analysis here. I’m still working at the surface of this search.]

2. The best (only?) examples of pedagogical master planning that I could find (so far) come from Australia. I was impressed by the concepting and work being done at the Southern Metropolitan Region in Victoria, Australia. From a PowerPoint deck, I could see great potential and excitement around the work. And in a PDF of the workshopping materials, I was captivated by a four-degree rubric for vision, curriculum implementation, pedagogy, personalized learning, etc. The only U.S. examples that I have located thus far are from universities and large public systems, and many of those seem to cross into big-picture strategic planning without much architectural detail, or into campus master planning.

3. In looking at about 30 campus master plans, I was struck by their common approach to mapping. Many, if not all, of the campus plans included color-coded legends that showed 1) existing construction, 2) phase I new construction, 3) phase I renovation, 4) phase II new construction, 5) phase II renovation, etc. I wonder if we could demonstrate the existence of such a plan with regard to pedagogical master planning in schools. In a faculty and administration of, let’s say, 200 people, could we discover a universally agreed upon sense of 1) which traditional pedagogies were to remain in place, 2) which “new” pedagogies would emerge systemically in phase I, 3) which consequential renovations would therefore need to take place in terms of classroom design, technology use, communication to parents, etc?

The searching and thinking will continue…

A lesson from chairs – for whom are many classrooms designed?

The chairs in classrooms can illustrate an interesting point…one worth considering. I can’t believe I’ve never really noticed this before. I’ve observed hundreds of classes. The actual chairs never made a note in my observations.

Compare and contrast the chairs at student desks with those at teacher desks. Which chairs are more flexible, more comfortable, more geared to ergonomic learning? What does the comparison show? For whom are many classrooms designed?

Earlier today, I was reading Jonathan Martin’s post – “Inspiring and Informative: Lessons Learned Visiting Albemarle Schools with Superintendent Pam Moran.” I was challenged and inspired by the rich details of the school visit.

I was also struck by the student and teacher seating. A small detail? Maybe. Maybe not.

#MustRead Shares (weekly)

  • tags: innovation design #MustRead brainfood

  • tags: leadership clarity paradox #MustRead brain food UnbouBrainFood

    • “the clarity paradox,” which can be summed up in four predictable phases:

        

      Phase 1: When we really have clarity of purpose, it leads to success.
       Phase 2: When we have success, it leads to more options and opportunities.
       Phase 3: When we have increased options and opportunities, it leads to diffused efforts.
       Phase 4: Diffused efforts undermine the very clarity that led to our success in the first place.

    • Curiously, and overstating the point in order to make it, success is a catalyst for failure.
    • one of the key reasons for these failures was that companies fell into “the undisciplined pursuit of more.”
    • What can we do to avoid the clarity paradox and continue our upward momentum? Here are three suggestions:
    • First, use more extreme criteria.
    • Second, ask “What is essential?” and eliminate the rest.
    • Third, beware of the endowment effect.
    • If success is a catalyst for failure because it leads to the “undisciplined pursuit of more,” then one simple antidote is the disciplined pursuit of less.
  • Massive open online courses (MOOCs), such as those offered by Coursera, are particularly intriguing in that they help democratize education.

    tags: online learning online_education online education #MustRead universities

    • Massive open online courses (MOOCs), such as those offered by Coursera, are particularly intriguing in that they help democratize education.
    • Still, there is much to be said in defense of the real-world classroom
    • Is there any intrinsic value to being bodily present in the classroom?
    • Students learn not only from engaging with ideas, but also by engaging each other.
    • Online education raises exciting possibilities for universities. MOOCs democratize educational access. But democratic education is also about habituating ourselves to encounter our fellow citizens, to disagree passionately and to tolerate disagreement. Traditional liberal arts classrooms democratize education not in quantitative terms, but in quality of access to Others.
  • According to the National Venture Capital Association, investment in education technology companies increased from less than $100 million in 2007 to nearly $400 million last year. For the huge generator of innovation, technology, and wealth that is Silicon Valley, higher education is a particularly fat target right now.

    tags: education technology disruption university online education online_education #MustRead brainfood

    • According to the National Venture Capital Association, investment in education technology companies increased from less than $100 million in 2007 to nearly $400 million last year. For the huge generator of innovation, technology, and wealth that is Silicon Valley, higher education is a particularly fat target right now.
    • The ongoing carnage in the newspaper industry provides an object lesson of what can happen when a long-established, information-focused industry’s business model is challenged by low-price competitors online.
    • The recent surge of money into higher education startups reflects growing interest in the category.
    • Is the real money to be made, per Marc Andreessen, in eating the existing education industry? Or will it be in providing service to the industry, helping them do what they do better? In terms popularized by Harvard business professor Clayton Christensen, this is the difference between “disruptive” and “sustaining” innovation.
    • So the VC guys and the start-ups look at K-12 and higher education, which between them cost over $1 trillion per year in America, and much more around the world. They see businesses that are organized around communication between people and the exchange of information, two things that are increasingly happening over the Internet. Right now, nearly all of that communication and exchange happens on physical platforms—schools and colleges—that were built a long time ago. A huge amount of money is tied up in labor and business arrangements that depend on things staying that way. How likely are they to stay that way, in the long term? Sure, there are a ton of regulatory protections and political complications tied up in the fact that most education is funded by the taxpayer. As always, the timing would be difficult, and there is as much risk in being too early as too late.
    • To drive home the point of just how cheap it is to be Quizlet, one of its executives asks me how much money the United States spends per year to educate a single student in K-12 education. About $15,000, I say. That’s more than what it costs us per month to host the entire site, serving millions,
    • In less than a year, online higher education has gone from the province of downmarket for-profit colleges to being embraced by the most famous universities in the world.
    • We may not know who and we may not know when, but someone is going to write the software that eats higher education.
    • Older models often adapt and endure in significant if less important forms.
  • tags: school reform strategy business #MustRead Senge UnbouBrainFood brainfood

  • tags: climate science culture social innovation #MustRead brainfood

    • Today, there is no doubt that a scientific consensus exists on the issue  of climate change
    • And yet a social consensus on climate change does not exist
    • answers to this question can be  found, not from the physical sciences, but from the social science  disciplines of psychology, sociology, anthropology, and others.
    • people’s opinions  on this and other complex scientific issues are based on their  prior ideological preferences, personal experience, and values—all  of which are heavily influenced by their referent groups and their  individual psychology.
    • We must acknowledge  that the debate over climate change, like almost all environmental  issues, is a debate over culture, worldviews, and ideology
      • The debate over school change must also be over culture, world views, and ideology.
    • Political affiliation is one of the strongest correlates  with individual uncertainty about climate change, not scientific  knowledge.
      • I wonder what the analogue is to education and the issue of school transformation? “Political affiliation is one of the strongest correlates with individual uncertainty about climate change, not scientific knowledge.”
    • “logic schism,”  a breakdown in debate in which opposing sides are talking about  completely different cultural issues.
  • tags: algebra STEM #MustRead

    • We can teach people the skills they need if we allow them to choose what interests them and then teach them to predict, evaluate, diagnose, etc., within their area of interest.
  • tags: School Change Big Shifts NAIS schools of the future #MustRead

  • tags: steam stem #MustRead

  • tags: culture #MustRead

  • tags: 21st 21C 21stcenturylearning brainfood #MustRead

  • tags: education brainfood UnbouBrainFood #MustRead schools of the future Change

    • although there are some encouraging signs of change, several major challenges stand out from my ongoing discussions with today’s 11-13 year olds.
    • A disconnect between the way school works and how they function outside school.
    • We are not preparing these kids for the world as it operates today.
    • Boredom with the teacher-centered learning process.
    • Shifting sources of authority.
    • new role for teachers (and parents): that of a learning facilitator and coach, rather than of an authoritative source of information.
    • Growing interest in pragmatic, job-oriented skills.
    • Unease regarding global standing.
    • Thurow argued that the most significant invention in U.S. history was the public education system established in the early days of the industrial revolution.
    • Thurow argues that this unique educational system produced a workforce that was perfectly matched — in both skills and behavior — to the burgeoning needs of the new industrial economy.
    • Students emerging from this system had both the right knowledge (reading, math) to perform the industrial jobs and the right behaviors (punctuality, focus on specific linear tasks) to form an efficient industrial workforce.
    • modeled both on the interests of industrialization and in the image of it: specialization into separate subjects, standardized curricula, conformity, batch processing — by age group. The system was designed to leverage a “lock step” approach over set periods of time and using broadcast delivery methods to prepare students effectively for known jobs.
    • our current approach to education was designed for a different age
    • we all know, most of the jobs of tomorrow will not be industrial jobs.
    • gap between the output of our educational system and the job demands of the current century is enormous — and growing wider.
    • kids intuitively recognize the gap. They’re asking for a change.
  • tags: nytimes com social media balance #MustRead

Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

Performance-based assessment in the 21st century – two perspectives #PBA

Two of my ed-leader heroes have written about performance-based assessment, PARCC, and the future of testing…

  1. Performance Task Assessment: 10 Things for Educators to Think About, posted by Jonathan Martin

  2. What Was the Question To Which PARCC Is the Answer?, posted by Mary Ann Reilly

Cut it to your core and concentrate on clarity

Rob Evans spoke of taking things off of our plates before adding more on. Gary Hamel introduced the notion of core competencies. And Greg McKeown gave us the clarity paradox.

“the clarity paradox,” … can be summed up in four predictable phases:

Phase 1: When we really have clarity of purpose, it leads to success. 
Phase 2: When we have success, it leads to more options and opportunities. 
Phase 3: When we have increased options and opportunities, it leads to diffused efforts. 
Phase 4: Diffused efforts undermine the very clarity that led to our success in the first place.

Curiously, and overstating the point in order to make it, success is a catalyst for failure.

– from “The Disciplined Pursuit of Less,” Harvard Business Review, August 8, 2012.

It’s a fundamental principal of design, too. Take away all that is non-essential. Reduce until you cannot reduce any more. Then, the best will remain. When I think of this principal, I think of a sculptor reducing a block of marble to the essential remains – I see something like Michelangelo’s David. In fact, now that I think of it, the content of the statue points strongly to the lesson, as well – a small boy with only a sling defeating an enormous giant.

One way in which a school can achieve systemic unity and cohesive pedagogical architecture – don’t add so much to your plate…know your core competency…maintain your clarity of purpose…strip away the stone to reveal the statue…master the sling and know your creator instead of carrying too many weapons and weighing yourself down with too much proudly worn armor.