-
How to Find and Amplify Creativity – Bruce Nussbaum – Harvard Business Review
“Creative competence is like a sport. You can train for it and increase the capacities of yourself and your organization.”
-
SXSW: Forget Stories. Your Brand Needs a Narrative. | Beyond PR
“Narratives differ from stories in two important ways, according to Hagel. First, narratives don’t have an end. They are open ended, and the resolution is yet to be determined. Secondly, narratives invite participation. The inherent message isn’t “Listen” — it’s “Join.””
-
To Become More Adaptable, Take a Lesson from Biology – Rafe Sagarin – Harvard Business Review
“All of Earth’s successful organisms have thrived without analyzing past crises or trying to predict the next one. They haven’t held “planning exercises” or created “predictive frameworks.” Instead, they’ve adapted. Adaptability is the power to detect and respond to change in the world, no matter how surprising or inconvenient it may be.”
-
Measuring Creativity: We Have the Technology – Werner Reinartz – Harvard Business Review
“Clearly, if you’re going to be creative, you need to apply divergent thinking. It would seem, to be a no-brainer. But the numbers show that remarkably few people engage in divergent thinking.”
-
It’s Time for Tenure to Lose Tenure – James C. Wetherbe – Harvard Business Review
“To make such changes possible, colleges need to make use of the same tools used in the business world such as employment contracts instead of jobs for life, process innovation, better allocation of resources, and more careful scrutiny of how research gets funded. Every college’s business school has taught how restrictive work rules and high labor costs for many years made American automotive, electronics, and other industries less competitive. Now universities need to adopt their own teachings and end tenure.”
-
Educational Leadership:Creativity Now!:The Case for Curiosity
“The irony is that children are born with an overpowering need to know. They want to know what every object feels and looks like and what will happen when they attempt to do different things with that object. They want to know why people behave the way they do. This voracious appetite for knowledge defines us as a species. And it doesn’t evaporate when babies become toddlers. Every preschool teacher knows that children between the ages of 18 months and 5 years are insatiable for information. Their curiosity drives much of their learning—through asking questions, watching what others do, listening to what adults say, and tinkering with the world around them. But somehow the incessant curiosity that leads to so much knowledge during the first five years of life dwindles as children go to school.”
(HT @centerteach)
-
Don’t Assess the Project: Thoughts on Assessing Project-Based Learning | 21k12
Jonathan Martin offers a fabulous look at PBL and assessment. There is much great soil here for learning, and there is incredible fodder for discussion and development. I don’t agree with everything, but Jonathan has given my much to expand my own knowledge and thinking.
-
Designing Integrated Curriculum – YouTube
Great 6 minute “documentary” about how a team of subject-area teachers work to design interdisciplinary projects, with real-world elements and applications.
-
Rob Fields: How Brands Can Provide Cultural Leadership – PSFK
“My interest is this: How can brands achieve their business goals by leading and influencing the direction of our collective sensibilities and our evolving understanding of how we make meaning of our lives?”
Now, re-read, but replace “brands” with “schools,” and maybe strike “business.”
-
The Professors’ Big Stage – NYTimes.com
“Institutions of higher learning must move, as the historian Walter Russell Mead puts it, from a model of “time served” to a model of “stuff learned.” Because increasingly the world does not care what you know. Everything is on Google. The world only cares, and will only pay for, what you can do with what you know.”
-
Five Ways Free Online Classes Will Change College, or Not | LinkedIn
“Because MOOCs are attracting so much attention and hype, they are often conflated as being the silver-bullet solution to all that ails higher education. They’re not. But that doesn’t mean they’ll be yesterday’s news by this time next year. Just like online shopping didn’t put brick-and-mortar stores out of business, online education can co-exist along traditional residential campuses. Shoppers need and like both forms of purchasing and college students like both forms of course delivery when they offer flexibility. Here are five ways MOOCs will and will not change higher ed in the coming years:”
-
“Let Us Plant Dates:” Our Role & Our Moment in Schools | chris.thinnes.me
“So there we were, having our umpteenth private and personal conversation about what school could be like, and what role we could plan in it (“We could start a ______;” “We could try a ______;” “We should talk to _____”), painting together on a Philadelphia streetcorner a picture of the world we want to live in, and the schools we want to help create. At some level it was deeply moving; at some level, too, it was of no more consequence to education than Fantasy Football is to the sport. And we spent some time exploring our relationship between ‘that’ world, and ‘this’ one.”
Are traditional report cards “vanity metrics?”
Are traditional report cards “vanity metrics?”
In the business world, we talk about the difference between vanity metrics and meaningful metrics. Vanity metrics are like dandelions – they might look pretty, but to most of us, they’re weeds, using up resources, and doing nothing for your property value.
from “Know the Difference Between Your Data and Your Metrics” by Jeff Bladt and Bob Filbin, Harvard Business Review | 11:00 AM March 4, 2013
English – 92
Math – 89
Science – 91
History – 88
PE – 93
Art – 90
Such a report card might make the refrigerator. But does it really say very much about the student’s growing capacities in writing (ideas, organization, word choice, sentence fluency, conventions, voice)? And did you assume from that last sentence that I was referring to English, or did you assume that such metrics could cut across the departmentalized curricular landscape and comprise parts of all the subject grades? Do we know if the student asks probing questions and demonstrates curiosity for understanding more deeply? What do those dandelions tell us about the student’s application of such thinking skills as divergent, emergent, and convergent explorations? What do we know of the student’s perseverance, resilience, risk taking, and grit? Can we make any deductions about the student’s observation and experimentation capabilities? Do we know how the student has demonstrated integrity and empathy from those pretty flowers on the refrigerator door?
From that data set, the one that will live indefinitely in the fireproof cabinets and ethernets of schools, what do we know about the student’s growth and emergence in the 4, 5, or 7Cs of 21st century skills? What do we see on that report card about mindset?
What are we grading? What are we measuring? What are we commenting on? What are we collecting and recording and archiving data on? What do we say matters most about our children? Do our report cards shed light on what we say we value most?
Is your school asking these questions? Why or why not? Are these questions among more systemic considerations that you are examining?
#QuestionsAreTheWaypointsOnThePathOfWisdom
#PedagogicalMasterPlanning
Schools: Would you score 50% on critical thinking allowance?
As a school, if you declare that you teach “critical thinking,” if you claim to develop this one of the 7 C’s of 21st C learning, then how much time and attention do you devote to divergent thinking? How much space and freedom do you allow for this 50% of meta-cognition? For faculty? For parents? For students? For administration?
Measuring Creativity: We Have the Technology
Or would you likely get a “50” on your report card for creative critical thinking allowance?
#HowDoWeCreateWhatWeFailToCulture?
Multi-disciplinary curiosity: 2 resources and the most important 21C “C”
In about 10-12 minutes, you can explore two intriguing examples of how teachers orchestrate integrated, multi-disciplinary curriculum.
From @SteveG_TLC: “Multi-disciplinary News” on What I Learned Today
Here’s a great example of how a news article we might read in the morning at TLC Middle School can be used as a springboard to learn in a truly multi-disciplinary way.
And from @BIEPBL: “Designing Integrated Curriculum” on YouTube
—
And I might just start putting this @ASCD article at the conclusion of every post:
The Case for Curiosity
The irony is that children are born with an overpowering need to know. They want to know what every object feels and looks like and what will happen when they attempt to do different things with that object. They want to know why people behave the way they do. This voracious appetite for knowledge defines us as a species. And it doesn’t evaporate when babies become toddlers. Every preschool teacher knows that children between the ages of 18 months and 5 years are insatiable for information. Their curiosity drives much of their learning—through asking questions, watching what others do, listening to what adults say, and tinkering with the world around them. But somehow the incessant curiosity that leads to so much knowledge during the first five years of life dwindles as children go to school.
Why place this article here? For me, curiosity is at the heart of both multi-disciplinary examples!
Real-life learning lessons from an article about the Intel Science Talent Contest #WhatIfWeekly
First, a few quotes:
- “The program, said Valerie Holmes, one of its teachers, encourages students to find a subject with which they have a personal connection.”
- “At Stuyvesant she continued to explore what she describes as “how interdisciplinary science can be.””
- “Part of what the research program teaches students, Ms. Holmes said, is tenacity; Dan and his advisers approached 30 to 40 potential mentors before finding one who would take him on.”
- “From there she taught herself cellphone software coding and electrical engineering techniques, using “breadboards” and a soldering iron. “Engineering is the field that worships impact,” she said of her choice to enter it, “and to have the greatest impact, it has to be in the developing world.””
[All emphasis mine.]
From “A Laboratory Grows Young Scientists,” By ETHAN HAUSER, NYTimes.com, Published: March 11, 2013.
When students are encouraged and empowered to engage in real-life learning, for which they can see the relevance now, strong progress and achievement is made. And not just for the students, but for the larger world of which they are a part.
From the quotes above, one can see five key components of “real-life learning,” something I write about often here. These traits make for some great education. Schooling could be enhanced to facilitate more of this kind of learning.
- personal connection
- interdisciplinary
- tenacity
- taught herself
- to have the greatest impact
What if school possessed more of the characteristics of scientific research, investigation, and exploration? And I don’t just mean that school should “do more science.” I mean that the very culture and foundation of school could look more like the culture and foundations of science – observing, questioning, hypothesizing, experimenting, reflecting, repeating with additional insights from testing, etc. Sounds a lot like innovating, too.
I’ve rarely (never) been to a lab where the scientists spent most of their time in rows and columns of desks receiving content for much of the day, day after day.