Reflections on #NAISAC13 – Part II. The message was clear. Now we must act.

After a few days of reflecting on #NAISAC13 (the National Association of Independent Schools’ Annual Conference 2013), I am hopeful!

From the general sessions that NAIS curated, I cannot imagine that there could be much confusion about core message – schooling and education are experiencing a grand revolution, and NAIS schools can be leaders or left behind in this revolutionIt’s a choice.

Jim Collins reprised his strong thoughts on Good to Great and Great by Choice. He was clear that level 5 leadership builds “enduring greatness through a paradoxical blend of personal humility and professional will.” He reminded us that mediocrity comes more often from chronic inconsistency than resistance to change. He implored us – new initiatives piled on are not the answer. Rather, knowing who you are, discerning with creativity what you can do of greater value than anyone else, and remaining disciplined about marching to that highest trajectory of yourself are the x factors of great success. Finally, Collins stressed that organizations must preserve their core values while adapting their practices on the march to greatness. The big problem, though, is that many organizations confuse their values and their practices. So, clarity of purpose and identity and character is a must.

Heads of school such as Nishant Mehta (soon to be a head of school at The Children’s School in Atlanta; currently at Alexandria Country Day School), Bill Taylor (St. George’s in Memphis), Matt Glendinning (Moses Brown School in Rhode Island), Jonathan Martin (former head at St. Gregory Preparatory School in Tucson), and Brett Jacobsen (Mount Vernon Presbyterian School in Atlanta) shared their stories with us about the work that school leaders must do to innovate school cultures and to reposition the practices of schools so that we are immersing learners in experiences that will help them grow as communicators, innovators, creative contributors, critical thinkers, collaborators, and solutions finders. Along with acclaimed journalists, consultants, and educators like Suzie Boss, Ken Kay, Chris Thinnes, and Grant Lichtman, the messaging in the workshops was as consistent and clear as that in the general sessions – the world is changing at an ever quickening rate, and we must re-imagine schools and implement transformation so that our learners can be in more project-based, design-oriented, community-engaged, and world-relevant organizations.

There were countless connecting threads emphasizing the importance and power of networked approaches to school transformation. Ken Kay explained the professional learning community EdLeader21, composed of 111 school districts and independent schools. Suzie Boss recapped her research, in her book Brining Innovation to Schools (see here, here and here), on the stellar models across the country of schools transforming for the demands of our times. Grant Lichtman shared his findings from visiting 64 schools in 12 weeks, looking for exemplars of school innovation. He detailed that schools that struggle with change tend to grapple with anchors, dams, and silos. Schools that embrace innovation model dynamism, adaptability, permeability, relevance, self-correction, and creativity. Grant challenged the notion that school innovation was just about looking forward, and he said that his findings could be summarized on one word – Dewey. The essence of school transformation calls on the tenets of the progressive education movement. Outgoing president of NAIS Pat Bassett echoes similar chords every time he speaks, too. Just look at his TEDx talk on the “Big Shifts” and paste those up next to a synopsis of progressive education.

Terarai Trent inspired us to never give up on a mission to help all people connect with the education that they deserve as human beings.

Cathy Davidson closed the conference with a final keynote that reinforced several pillars holding up an overarching theme: kids today know that there is a significant mismatch between school and the way we learn in real life. In more detail, she emphasized five main ideas:

  1. Rethink liberal arts as a start-up curriculum for resilient global citizens.
  2. Move from critical thinking to creative contribution.
  3. Make sure what you value is what you count.
  4. Find creative ways to model un-learning.
  5. Take institutional change personally.

At least for my experience at #NAISAC13, there was great consistency and conviction in the messages. In fact, to me, the different voices were essentially singers in the same chorus.

To help me reflect this week, I reviewed ALL of the tweets from #NAISAC13. I packaged my own story of those tweets in a Storify. [View the story “NAISAC13” on Storify]

I’d be interested to hear other people’s primary take away, but mine was clear: schools must change, and in ways that empower students to be creative contributors and interested innovators and caring citizens.

http://annualconference.nais.org/Pages/default.aspx

The printed theme of #NAISAC13 was “Revolutionary Traditions: Think Big, Think Great.” But I believe we’ve been thinking about this stuff long enough. Revolutions require more action, move movement, more doing. The theme was not “resolutions,” but “revolutions.” The place was Philadelphia.

In reality, I think NAIS and the leaders gathered there communicated an even more powerful and hopeful theme: “Act Big, Be Great.” I’m so grateful for those who are DOING so.

= = =

And this from an email sent by NAIS after the conference:

Dear Colleague,

Thank you so much for joining us in Philadelphia for the 2013 NAIS Annual Conference. The spirit and great attitude of everyone in attendance will certainly spark our imaginations to revolutionize our schools – and the future of education.

Looking for more information to continue learning and brainstorming? Here’s just a sampling of what you’ll find on the NAIS Annual Conference website as we continue to update it during the next two weeks:

  • JPGs of the graphic recordings that the artists illustrated during the general sessions and featured workshops;
  • Interviews with many of the conference speakers;
  • Workshop handouts/presentations;
  • Articles about the general session and featured workshop speakers;
  • Videos of Sekou Andrews, Danah Boyd, Soumitra Dutta, and Alexis Madrigal;
  • And more!

Check the site regularly as we continue to add new materials.

How might we hack school to more closely resemble good education? #MustSee Logan LaPlante

We don’t seem to make learning to be happy and healthy a priority in our schools. It’s separate from schools. And for some kids it doesn’t exist at all. But what if we didn’t make it separate? What if we based education on the study and practice of being happy and healthy? Because that’s what it is – a practice. And a simple practice at that.

– Logan LaPlante, 13 years old. TEDxUniversityOfNevada

When I think about what I want for my own children, and when I think about what I want for all children, my list includes the attributes and ideals and realities that LaPlante shares and demonstrates in his profound talk: “Hackschooling Makes Me Happy: Logan LaPlante at TEDxUniversityofNevada.” It may be one of the best TED/TEDx talks I’ve heard.

.

Also this week, I am immersing myself in Tom Little’s tour of 50 progressive schools during the months of February and March. (Thanks, @GrantLichtman!) As I read @ParkDayTom’s posts, I dig into the school websites and links that Little provides about “emergent curriculum,” PBL, and progressive education. I am struck by such things as…

Learning
We believe that learning should be joyful, active, open-ended, project-based, and collaborative in order to foster children’s independence, accountability, intrinsic motivation, and intellectual curiosity.

Engaging
We believe in cultivating a community of civically-active learners, where everyone’s voice can be heard, as decisions are democratically determined through discourse.

Unfolding
We believe in allowing the time, patience and unpressured environment necessary to support the individual developmental unfolding of each child – academically, socially, and emotionally.

The Children’s School (Chicago) Core Beliefs

And…

Though educators have been challenged in agreeing upon a single definition for progressive education, consensus builds around these defining principles:

  • Education must prepare students for active participation in a democratic society.
  • Education must focus on students’ social, emotional, academic, cognitive and physical development.
  • Education must nurture and support students’ natural curiosity and innate desire to learn. Education must foster internal motivation in students.
  • Education must be responsive to the developmental needs of students.
  • Education must foster respectful relationships between teachers and students.
  • Education must encourage the active participation of students in their learning, which arises from previous experience.
  • Progressive educators must play an active role in guiding the educational vision of our society.

– Progressive Education Network

When Grant Lichtman and I talk, and when I am privileged enough to hear Grant speak and facilitate with bigger audiences, he often says that his own tour of 64 schools in 12 weeks, exploring what innovation in education looks like, could be boiled down to one word – Dewey.

How might we work and take action to help transform schools so that more of them possess these core characteristics? Theses core values?

How might we hack school to more closely resemble good education?

How are pedagogies acting like species in the school ecosystem? #PedagogicalMasterPlanning

by Jennifer Parks as seen in Sean Gourley's talk: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V43a-KxLFcg

by Jennifer Parks as seen in Sean Gourley’s talk: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V43a-KxLFcg

Do you ever wonder about the various ways that schools are working to transform their teaching and learning practices? I wonder about this all the time. In fact, thinking about school transformation and working for school transformation define my educational career, especially the past decade and current next chapter of my career.

I’m convinced that schools are complex ecosystems. Within those ecosystems, in efforts to enhance education and forward schools, I wonder how our developing practices are acting like competing species in a natural ecosystem’s food or energy web.

In the screen grab above, we can see a diagram of an ecosystem energy web. I’ve seen this image used in a number of presentations and talks. The colored species are thriving and dominating, and the grayed species are declining and disappearing from the ecosystem.

I wonder how project-based learning, design thinking, inquiry-based instruction, formative assessment, standards-based grading, performance-based assessment, e-portfolios, etc. are interacting in transforming schools. I wonder how these Dewey-progressive and 21st-century-skills approaches are behaving like reinforcing and competing “species” in the school ecosystem. I wonder how they are interacting with more traditional practices and methodologies, and I wonder how they are interacting with each other. The interactions with each other really fascinate me.

For those who know me or read this blog, you understand that I am a strong believer in PBL (project-based learning, problem-based learning, passion-based learning, etc.). Yet, I often worry when I imagine a middle school student taking six or seven departmentalized courses, and her teachers somewhat or entirely adopting PBL… as independent practitioners. Even thinking about half of them adopting PBL as independent practitioners can cause me some concern.

I start to imagine that seventh grader trying to manage four large-scale projects that are not coordinated or integrated across the departmentalized subjects. I start to wonder if the PBL will be the “dominant species” in the ecosystem, or if the departmentalized subject species will devour and crowd out the PBL species. Will the 55-minute time slot for class be the predator or the prey? Or could they become symbiotic species, if the other system characteristics were thoughtfully re-examined and redesigned? How might “flipping the classroom” become a symbiotic or predatory species? (If folks aren’t careful, can you imagine those poor parents at home managing four independent projects with their over-stretched children? Yikes!)

I wonder how the teachers’ assessment practices (species) will complement or compete with the PBL species. I wonder about design thinking being integrated into a course whose teacher is moving intentionally toward PBL. Then, I start to wonder how the traditional content grading will fit with a species that depends on iterative prototyping and rapid failing to conceptualize enhancement and reach eventual success. I wonder about the report card or progress report species trying to capture the elements of this system – elements that are better understood disaggregated rather than smashed into a single number.

I wonder about students designing for perceived problems and struggling to interact with “real” community members because of the online policy species that was introduced to the school ecosystem. I wonder about the level of access of the students and teachers to the surrounding community, and then I think back to those departmentalized subjects and students trying to manage four sets of discovery-and-interview phases in their silo-ed project work.

Which species will prove dominant in the ecosystems of our schools? Are we thoughtfully designing these ecosystems with collaborative and integrated thinking, so that the parts of the system harmonize with instead of cannibalize each other?

Are we designing and nurturing and sustaining the ecosystem from a learner UX point of view? (“UX” is short for user experience.)

#PedagogicalMasterPlanning

Thanks to @MarkCHale, head of Greensboro Day School, for putting me onto “Recombinant Education: Regenerating the Learning Ecosystem,” which is KnowledgeWorks’ Forecast 3.0 and the work of Andrea Saveri. Exploring this resource led me to “TEDxNewWallStreet – Sean Gourley – High frequency trading and the new algorithmic ecosystem,” all of which significantly helped me think more deeply about the interplay of the current and coming changes in schooling and education.

#MustRead Shares (weekly)

  • tags: change #MustRead

  • Great resource from Business Innovation Factory —
    “BMGF contracted the Business Innovation Factory (BIF) to better understand the feedback that teachers receive, in what ways that feedback is shared, and under what conditions the feedback impacts teacher performance (both negatively and positively).”

    tags: feedback teachers professional learning teacher_effectiveness #MustRead

  • What if school were not modeled on an industrial paradigm – seemingly composed of various parts that make a whole? Perhaps instruction, curriculum, assessment, etc. are not parts but more accurately a system of one “material.” Using such natural paradigm for the design of schools could result in a more organic and human way of learning. 

    I enjoyed discovering Neri Oxman’s work via Business Innovation Factory. There is much here to translate to school transformation and redesign.

    tags: innovation #MustRead

  • “The central strategy for Bennington turned out to be disarmingly simple and straightforward: to turn the world’s most pressing problems themselves into major definers and organizers of the curriculum. They would be accorded the same authority to generate and organize curriculum now held exclusively by the traditional disciplines in the arts and sciences.”

    tags: #MustRead PBL real-life Challenge_Based_Learning Bennington problem_based_learning

  • “In recent years interest has grown in ‘pedagogy’ within English-language discussions of education. The impetus has come from different directions. There have been those like Paulo Freire seeking a ‘pedagogy of the oppressed’ or ‘critical pedagogy’; practitioners wanting to rework the boundaries of care and education via the idea of social pedagogy; and, perhaps most significantly, governments wanting to constraint the activities of teachers by requiring adherence to preferred ‘pedagogies’.

    “A common way of approaching pedagogy is as the art and science (and maybe even craft) of teaching. As we will see, viewing pedagogy in this way both fails to honour the historical experience, and fails to connect crucial areas of theory and practice.”

    tags: pedagogy #MustRead

  • “The school’s mission statement spells out the core ingredients such a re-imagining will require: “cultivating creative, joyful and compassionate inquirers who use courageous and innovative thinking to build a harmonious and sustainable world.” “

    tags: transformation #MustRead

Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

School in the Cloud – Sugata Mitra’s TED Prize

We’re born learners…

Onstage at TED2013, Sugata Mitra makes his bold TED Prize wish: Help me design the School in the Cloud, a learning lab in India, where children can explore and learn from each other — using resources and mentoring from the cloud. Hear his inspiring vision for Self Organized Learning Environments (SOLE), and learn more at tedprize.org.