-
“Rite-Solutions created a state-of-the-art “innovation engine” designed to provoke and align individual brilliance toward collective genius. The goal was to connect on an emotional level where all employees are entrusted with the future direction of the company, asked for their opinions, listened to, and rewarded for successful ideas. Our quest is for each employee to feel “more relevant” and turn that relevance into forward motion toward a future state that we all create.”
-
Rite-Solutions created a state-of-the-art “innovation engine” designed to provoke and align individual brilliance toward collective genius. The goal was to connect on an emotional level where all employees are entrusted with the future direction of the company, asked for their opinions, listened to, and rewarded for successful ideas. Our quest is for each employee to feel “more relevant” and turn that relevance into forward motion toward a future state that we all create.
-
You start to get the message Day One. At 9am on your first day of work we throw you a birthday party—with wrapped presents, cake and all kinds of fun. That morning, your family gets the “welcome wagon”—flowers, gifts and a personal note from me and Joe, delivered at home.
Why do we give people a party when they’re leaving a company? That’s not the time to make them feel important! How do we make people feel important the moment they join a company? The idea behind the birthday party is that you’ve arrived at a new place where you belong, you were expected, and you are important.
Even better, when you go to your birthday party, everyone in the room has a lot of different reasons to relate to you. New recruits fill out a “birth certificate,” which details their hobbies, travel experiences, family, schooling, pets, military service, and surprising facts—like a hobby of growing giant pumpkins or playing a particular instrument..
-
Love this idea of throwing people a party when they START at a school, not when they leave!
-
-
-
A Crash Course in Innovation | Edutopia
-
At capacity, SCS will serve 900 students in grades 6-12. Teens learn alongside college role models who are preparing for careers in creative professions.
-
Great synergy possible among 6-12 teens and college students studying for careers in creative professions. Interesting model of Ken Robinson’s “not grouping by date of manufacture.”
-
-
HFLI model emphasizes readiness for college and careers, “but we also want students to become active agents in community redevelopment,”
-
-
Can Innovation Skills Be Learned? | Edutopia
-
- Curiosity, which is a habit of asking good questions and a desire to understand more deeply
- Collaboration, which begins with listening to and learning from others who have perspectives and expertise that are very different from your own
- Associative or integrative thinking
- A bias toward action and experimentation
-
But as an educator and a parent, what I find most significant in this list is that it represents a set of skills and habits of mind that can be nurtured, taught and mentored!
-
“Innovative entrepreneurship is not a genetic predisposition, it is an active endeavor.
-
what you have learned to do is more essential
-
But by the time they are 6½ years old, they stop asking questions because they quickly learn that teachers value the right answers more than provocative questions.
-
“Creativity is a habit. The problem is that schools sometimes treat it as a bad habit . . . Like any habit, creativity can either be encouraged or discouraged.”
-
-
-
Creative people have a great deal of physical energy, but they’re also often quiet and at rest.
-
Creative people tend to be smart yet naive at the same time.
-
the convergent and the divergent
-
I wonder…are schools pretty good at the convergent, but relatively negligent of the divergent? If so, could this mean we are scoring a “50” in terms of educating “whole people?”
-
-
People often claimed to have had only two or three good ideas in their entire career, but each idea was so generative that it kept them busy for a lifetime of testing, filling out, elaborating, and applying
-
Educational transformation in ways that enhance and amplify the blurring of lines between “school” and “life” seems to be an idea worth pursuing for a lifetime!
-
-
Creative people combine playfulness and discipline, or responsibility and irresponsibility
-
Nina Holton, whose playfully wild germs of ideas are the genesis of her sculpture, is very firm about the importance of hard work: “Tell anybody you’re a sculptor and they’ll say, ‘Oh, how exciting, how wonderful.’ And I tend to say, ‘What’s so wonderful?’ It’s like being a mason, or a carpenter, half the time. But they don’t wish to hear that because they really only imagine the first part, the exciting part. But, as Khrushchev once said, that doesn’t fry pancakes, you see. That germ of an idea does not make a sculpture which stands up. It just sits there. So the next stage is the hard work. Can you really translate it into a piece of sculpture?”
-
This paragraph about sculpting and hard work reminds me of “Grit” from Jonah Lehrer’s talk on 99%. Great connection to Drive, Mindset, Talent Code, Element, etc.
-
-
Creative people alternate between imagination and fantasy, and a rooted sense of reality
-
Creative people tend to be both extroverted and introverted
-
Creative people are humble and proud at the same time
-
Creative people, to an extent, escape rigid gender role stereotyping
-
Creative people are both rebellious and conservative
-
In innovation, you have to play a less safe game
-
Most creative people are very passionate about their work, yet they can be extremely objective about it as well
-
Creative people’s openness and sensitivity often exposes them to suffering and pain, yet also to a great deal of enjoyment.
-
Being alone at the forefront of a discipline also leaves you exposed and vulnerable
-
-
How Pixar Fosters Collective Creativity – Harvard Business Review
-
If you want to be original, you have to accept the uncertainty, even when it’s uncomfortable, and have the capability to recover when your organization takes a big risk and fails. What’s the key to being able to recover? Talented people! Contrary to what the studio head asserted at lunch that day, such people are not so easy to find.
-
-
Charles Leadbeater: Education innovation in the slums | Video on TED.com
-
Common Core State Standards Initiative | Key Points In Mathematics
-
standards stress not only procedural skill but also conceptual understanding, to make sure students are learning and absorbing the critical information they need to succeed at higher levels – rather than the current practices by which many students learn enough to get by on the next test, but forget it shortly thereafter, only to review again the following year.
-
high school standards call on students to practice applying mathematical ways of thinking to real world issues and challenges
-
develop a depth of understanding and ability to apply mathematics to novel situations
-
high school standards emphasize mathematical modeling, the use of mathematics and statistics to analyze empirical situations, understand them better, and improve decisions
-
“Modeling links classroom mathematics and statistics to everyday life, work, and decision-making. It is the process of choosing and using appropriate mathematics and statistics to analyze empirical situations, to understand them better, and to improve decisions. Quantities and their relationships in physical, economic, public policy, social and everyday situations can be modeled using mathematical and statistical methods. When making mathematical models, technology is valuable for varying assumptions, exploring consequences, and comparing predictions with data.”
-
-
Common Core State Standards Initiative | Key Points In English Language Arts
-
range of subjects
-
Research—both short, focused projects (such as those commonly required in the workplace) and longer term in depth research —is emphasized throughout the standards but most prominently in the writing strand since a written analysis and presentation of findings is so often critical.
-
students gain, evaluate, and present increasingly complex information, ideas, and evidence through listening and speaking as well as through media.
-
Formal presentations are one important way such talk occurs, but so is the more informal discussion that takes place as students collaborate to answer questions, build understanding, and solve problems.
-
standards help prepare students for real life experience at college and in 21st century careers
-
-
Colleges Awakening to the Opportunities of Data Mining – NYTimes.com
-
Social and Emotional Curriculum: Sharing Your Gift | Edutopia
-
“Happiness comes from giving, not getting . . . to get joy, we must give it, and to keep joy we must scatter it.”
-
This article on sharing your gift seems intimately connected to PBL and the future of schools to me. If classroom work was done more to share gifts, innovation, enhancements and less as just-a-completion-of-an-assignment-only-the-teacher-will-see, then the level of engagement would seem to rise dramatically. The possibility for solutions-oriented education would rise dramatically, too.
-
-
moving from “me” to “we.”
-
signposts that can mark the way
-
Could these also be some of the signposts for school transformation to a more 21C model?
-
-
-
10 Things in School That Should Be Obsolete | MindShift
Process Post: Knowing Ourselves, Using Our Whole Brains, and Eating Wisely
For those attuned to educational discussions, I am stating the obvious to say that schools face a multitude of change factors and a high degree of transformational influence. Perhaps because of a hard-to-recipe blend of world and environmental change, traditions and habits of schooling, and a unique situation of “client-empathy delay” (parents understandably have a movie in their minds about what “school” is), many schools face at least three fundamental issues:
- Organizational confusion
- Operational inertia
- Opportunity overload
[With all the alphabet soup out there, I am tempted to call these the 3 O’s! If I imagine those three O’s as intersecting fields of a Venn diagram, a school can really feel in a hole as it wrestles and struggles with all three issues simultaneously.]
To maximize future potential, I believe schools can do a better job of focusing on three inter-related and continuously evolving processes:
- Know who you are and who you want to become. I would be very skeptical of the builder who gathered materials and began constructing without blueprints, engineering specs, and even scale models. Yet, as a school leader, I often behaved this way. “Let’s adopt more formative assessment.” “We should be using more PBL.” “Let’s switch computer platforms.” While there is nothing wrong with those sub-decisions, they are better made in a system of wholeness and self-knowledge.
.
Inspired by designer Nicholas Felton, Todd Silverstein, who has started Vizify, describes a zooming out so that one can see more of the whole system. Recently, he told Fast Company, “They’re starting with the parts, and we’re starting with the whole and illustrating parts where it makes sense.” (Kessler, “Vizify Turns Your Social Network Into an Infographic about Your Life“) Regardless of your views on social media, there is much wisdom in this quote about understanding the whole in order to make the best decisions about the parts.
.
Do schools know who they are and who they want to become? Are they innovating the dusty practices of strategic planning to be more nimble and flexible in an ever-quickening change environment? Are schools developing processes for studying themselves in real-time – looking in the mirror every morning to comb their hair and making sure their socks match – so that they are organizationally coherent?
.
As intra-school practitioners develop a widening gap of proficiencies and skills, and as we innovate in loosely defined sub-tribes of a school, schools are experiencing the “school-within-a-school” effect. Two children can have drastically different school experiences based on the roster of teachers they are assigned. Of course, a certain spectrum of variation is healthy, but many schools are finding it harder and harder to describe who they are and to show a full set of blueprints for who they want to become. Schools can become schizophrenic and suffer from organizational (identity) confusion. And there are so many constituencies with whom to communicate about school identity – students, faculty, parents, alumni, board members, etc. Thoughtful and well-adapted communications schema are a must – internally, as well as externally. We need to start by knowing who we are and who we want to become. And we need to be intentional about our parts development, based on a well-designed and articulated whole.
. - Use your whole brain. On July 18, I posted “Orchestrating Conflict, Developing Experiments…and Carving Butter: Adaptive Leadership #PBL Ponderings” and an idea for using Rite-Solution’s “Mutual Fun” to create a similar idea-development exchange among faculty at a school. I first read about Rite-Solution’s “Mutual Fun” in Michael Michalko’s Creative Thinkering. At the end of last week, a colleague at Unboundary circulated “The Social Side of Strategy” by Arne Gast and Michele Zanini, and this great piece also highlights Rite-Solution’s “Mutual Fun.” Thanks to this article, I found “Nobody’s as Smart as Everybody—Unleashing Individual Brilliance and Aligning Collective Genius” by Jim Lavoie at Rite-Solutions, which gives a very detailed description of the company philosophy and practice of “Mutual Fun,” complete with screenshots of the traders’ portfolio windows. My “Idea #1” on the July 18 post is just a concrete way of thinking about how to empower the greatest single resource of any school – it’s faculty. I am not wed to the specifics of “Mutual Fun” (although I LOVE the framework), but I am wed to empowering the mainstay of a school – the faculty. In my tenure as principal, I utilized PLCs to accomplish such an end, and I am a strong advocate for the PLC ethos and structure. However, I mostly want to advocate for any system that empowers teachers to co-pilot the school, and for one that tears down walls between admin and faculty, faculty and faculty, parents and faculty, etc. I am particularly interested in tearing down walls among faculty and administrators.
.
Often times, administrators and faculty can feel misaligned, and many schools suffer from an “us-them” among admin and teachers. Industrial-age, top-down hierarchies still dominate many school organizational charts. At Rite-Solutions, the company leaders became “social architects” in such a way that they could harness the whole brain of the organization and move more nimbly in a united team of employees. If schools really believe in their faculty, then we should give the faculty more ownership of the system. “Mutual Fun” is but one way to do so. But I can imagine a faculty that develops learning opportunities through a system like “Mutual Fun” instead of having to go through a more rigid hierarchy of course submission and approval with a disconnected admin review board or central office. I can imagine a school that moves with the flow of its faculty – a faculty who feels full ownership in the purposeful directioning of the school…a faculty who chooses to have its rafts in the same river all paddling in the same directions.
. - Only put on your plate what you can eat. Initiative overload is a common ailment among schools. At conferences around the country, speakers develop immediate empathy from their audiences by commiserating about the number of initiatives being undertaken by a school. Much of the tribal-ness seems to come from unifying against a common enemy – the “dreaded administration” that heaps on the top-down initiative buffet. But what if we used our whole brain and developed a more social-architecture approach to fulfilling the unified, co-authored visioning of a school? Then, the faculty and administration – as a coherent team – might be better able to control the portion size and number of items on the organizational plate. Communication would improve as we all became better versed in the coherent identity of the school. With greater communication, mutual understanding, and collective, distributed decision making, a school family could define better the domains in which it is going to operate and the areas that it will leave to other school families who know that they are different, serving an equally well-articulated niche of the educational spectrum. We cannot be all things to all people, and schools could niche diverse areas of expertise if we knew better who we are, how we influence and own the whole, and control the portion sizes on our responsibility plates.
[Well, I’ve run out of time on this process post.]
I would love to know your thoughts, responses, reactions, and questions. I hope you’ll share what you’re thinking. If you have a related piece of writing or recommended reading, please add to the comments. Together, we could figure this out!
Tracking Time to Learn from Our Patterns – a Lesson from My New World
At my new company, we track our time. I imagine many companies track how time is spent. For me, in these two weeks, during an 8-9 hour day, I probably spend 3 minutes total going through the exercise of tracking my time. So, it’s easy. The software we use makes it easy. There are pre-poulated pull-down menus and sub-menus. There are wonderfully granular levels of such activity as “research.” There are text fields so that I can add commentary, too. Then, I can look at reports of how I am spending my time. Of course, my coaches can also view how I spend my time, and I totally and completely trust them to do so.
What if we teachers tracked our time like this? Recently, at lunch with a colleague, I mentioned how surprised I was to learn that I am loving my self-tracking of time. Because I have spent 20 years in schools, and because I love to integrate most of what I am learning with school life, I could imagine us teachers tracking our time. I could imagine content-oriented pull-down menus and sub-menus. I could imagine skill-oriented pull-down menus and sub-menus. I could imagine methodology and pedagogy menus and sub-menus. I could imagine running a report after two weeks and seeing for myself, “Wow. I spent 78% of my teaching time this week lecturing. Is that a good thing? How might I re-balance my methodology and approaches given my SMART goal and desired outcome for the year?”
Of course, I also imagined students tracking their time. In the spirit of making education “more pull, than push,” I would love for a student to share with me in an individual conference how he or she had spent his/her learning time during the week or two-week period. I could imagine doing this with advisees, so that I could discover with them how they are exploring their interests and spending time in their structured school-learning environments. I could imagine seeing the cross-polinations and synergies among class-content time recordings and self-directed time recordings.
In many ways, I see my time tracking as related to the tips shared in an article that a colleague sent to me about 11 secrets of leadership. My time tracking allows me to record reality in short bits, and then I can study my time to be more proactive about how I structure my days to further leadership and learning.
Time is a valuable resource. In fact, time may be the most valuable resource. I am thrilled to have a better handle on how I spend my time so that I can be purposeful, intentional, and strategic about making the most of my opportunities to create impact and to make a difference.
How are you spending your time…your time learning…your time teaching…your time working?
[Interestingly, after talking about this with my friend at lunch, he sent me a link to Lesson Note, a digital tool for tracking class activity, particularly as it relates to “lesson study,” an action research collaboration in learning communities for which I am a strong and dedicated advocate. However, the kind of time tracking that I am sharing above is very different and only distantly related to Lesson Note tracking. The type of time tracking I am discussing feels more self-initiated and self-directed. Of course, Lesson Note could be used in very positive and powerful ways, too, if a team decided to employ such a digital resource to advance their work and understanding about their teaching.]
Addendum to 7-24-12: I dream a school…the “schoolification of the world.” Brilliant #TED #MustWatch
Education needs to work by pull, not push. – Charles Leadbeater
If you are interested in educational innovation, school reform, or learning enhancement, WATCH THIS! With all of the TED talks that I view, I have never seen this one – “Charles Leadbeater: Education innovation in the slums” [18:58]. It was captured over two years ago. Charles Leadbeater makes a compelling case for pull vs. push education.*
[To me, the story of how I found this is fascinating. After re-reading the first 16 sections of Seth Godin’s “Stop Stealing Dreams” for about an hour, as part of continuing research, I was exploring possible TEDx speakers. Within search engines and tools, I was grabbing combinations of “innovation” and other words. I stumbled upon Leadbeater’s April 2010 TED talk, and I was intrigued by the sidebar because of a recent podcast I has listened to about the Future of Cities and what we can learn from slum evolution. As I started listening to Leadbeater, I was blown away by the connections among Leadbeater’s stories and the way in which Godin begins “Stop Stealing Dreams” with the Harlem Village Academies.]
Connect, connect, connect.
Connect, connect, connect.
Four years ago, FedEx identified Access—the idea that greater connections between people, businesses and nations create a virtuous cycle. “The ability to make wider connections spurs innovation and entrepreneurialism, and enables gains in productivity,” said the first issue of this magazine. “Businesses are born and expand, communities and nations reap the benefits, and a thirst for still greater Access results.” http://about.fedex.designcdt.com/access/WhyAccessMattersNow
E.M. Forster wrote in Howard’s End, “Only connect.”
Seventh/eighth grade teacher Clarence Fisher has an interesting way of describing his classroom up in Snow Lake, Manitoba. As he tells it, it has “thin walls,” meaning that despite being eight hours north of the nearest metropolitan airport, his students are getting out into the world on a regular basis, using the Web to connect and collaborate with students in far flung places from around the globe. The name of Clarence’s blog, “Remote Access,” sums up nicely the opportunities that his students have in their networked classroom. http://weblogg-ed.com/2011/personal-learning-networks-an-excerpt/
I read many blogs and follow many tweets that suggest we should all connect, share, and collaborate more often. I agree. However, many times we say it and it sounds good, but we never get to see examples while trying to keep up with the real time tweet deck. It quickly turns into platitude chat. So I decided to welcome you, the reader, into my classroom and showcase what a typical, connected class looks like. http://www.edutopia.org/blog/connected-classroom-information-literacy
Frankly, if you are not a connected educator at this point, you may not have an awareness that we are at a critical juncture in education. These driving questions must be answered. If you are not a connected educator, how can you support your own professional growth and the success of your children if you are not constantly questioning, re-evaluating, and striving for improvement?
http://lynhilt.com/getconnectedmakeadifference/