[Disclaimer: No one but I may want to read this post. Essentially, I am using this space to organize some past posts that I have written – to organize them in relation to Tony Wagner’s recent article about graduating innovation-ready students. The following is like a form of sticky-noting on my blog. But, as I have come to believe, why do this only for myself in a physical notebook…when I could share and possibly help another educational thinker/doer.]
Earlier today, I read a very powerful article about education and innovation – Graduating All Students Innovation-Ready, By Tony Wagner, September 12, 2012 Education Week. The article resonated with me in a way that only a few articles do. Even though I read voraciously, and even though I mark several articles a week “#MustRead,” I only occasionally discover and read one of those top 0.001% pieces of wonder.
In part, I think Wagner’s piece resonated so profoundly with me because I am doing some ongoing work that is providing mental velcro for such a piece of thinking-stimulant. Wagner’s four main implementation recommendations rung in my ears and everywhere else. I myself believe in:
- digital portfolio and authentic assessment over traditional, siloed marking and grading;
- teacher assessment based on professional learning and growth and evidence of student learning beyond mere “test scores.” Also, I believe admin should do what we expect of teachers and students! [related – Folio]
- schools collaborating together, and with business and non-profits, to create R&D for education…and to impact the world more positively now;
- learning built on play, passion, and purpose…learning infused with choice and global relevance…learning contextualized with real life. [related – #PBL, #FSBL]
This blog is one of my own R&D spaces…one of my own digital portfolios…one of my own passion and purpose-based play spaces. I have been writing for months on the four topics above. In particular, I engaged in a 60-day experiment about how we might transform school and education (CHANGEd: What if…60-60-60). Tony Wagner’s piece made me recall much of that thinking.
Tony Wagner’s article also further contextualized the exact reason that I left Westminster to join Unboundary as Director of Educational Innovation.
So I am organizing, and I am making some annotations…
Our students want to become innovators. Our economy needs them to become innovators. The question is: As educators, do we have the courage to disrupt conventional wisdom and pursue the innovations that matter most?.
1. Digital Portfolios and Better Assessment:
- CHANGEd: What if school leaders practiced the change they preach…and developed a people strategy? 60-60-60 #57, May 4, 2012 [Administrators should model what we expect from faculty]
- CHANGEd: What if teachers and students swapped roles more often? 60-60-60 #41, April 17, 2012
- Back in the saddle again…and thinking about activators, July 3, 2012
- CHANGEd: What if we scrimmaged and rehearsed more – like teams? 60-60-60 #48, April 24, 2012
- CHANGEd: What if we schools collaborated more purposefully? 60-60-60 #43, April 19, 2012
- I believe Unboundary is uniquely able to create such an R&D lab in Atlanta (and beyond) by engaging as the transformation design firm we are.
- CHANGEd: What if we built school-innovation labs…in schools? 60-60-60 #34, April 11, 2012
4. Play, Passion, and Purpose:
“Finally, we need to incorporate a better understanding of how students are motivated to do their best work into our course and school designs. Google has a 20 percent rule, whereby all employees have the equivalent of one day a week to work on any project they choose. These projects have produced many of Google’s most important innovations. I would like to see this same rule applied to every classroom in America, as a way to create time for students to pursue their own interests and continue to develop their sense of play, passion, and purpose.” [emphasis from my highlighting in Diigo]
- Synergy, Kiran Bir Sethi teaches kids to take charge, etc.
- CHANGEd: What if we really reflected on what former students remember? 60-60-60 #58, May 5, 2012
- CHANGEd: What if we used reading and Google Earth as spingboards for interdisciplinary, global empathy? 60-60-60 #54, May 1, 2012
- CHANGEd: What if schools IGNITEd more Leonardo da Vincis? 60-60-60 #53, April 30, 2012
- CHANGEd: What if we connected students with city design projects? 60-60-60 #52, April 29, 2012
- CHANGEd: What if we scaled “playing school?” 60-60-60 #39, April 15, 2012
- CHANGEd: What if school could look more like Caine’s Arcade? 60-60-60 #38, April 14, 2012
- CHANGEd: What if we amplified the bright spots of lunch, recess, and PE? 60-60-60 #36, April 12, 2012
- CHANGEd: What if we ridiculously relegate playgrounds to “outside of school?” 60-60-60 #35, April 11, 2012
Pingback: Networks, Peer Progressives, School 3.0, and Future Perfect #IDreamASchool #School3pt0 | it's about learning
Mandating that schools teach innovation as if it were just another course or funding more charter schools won’t solve the problem. The solution requires a new way of evaluating student performance and investing in education. Students should have digital portfolios that demonstrate progressive mastery of the skills needed to innovate. Teachers need professional development to learn how to create hands-on, project-based, interdisciplinary courses. Larger school districts and states should establish new charter-like laboratory schools of choice that pioneer these new approaches.
I agree. I did not realize I had implied mandating innovation or funding more charter schools. I am all for the imbedding of innovative practices, not silo-ing in a “new course.” I am all for digital portfolios. I am all for the professional learning you mention. And I am all for R&D in schools and lab-based learning.
Thanks for the comment.