#MustRead Shares (weekly)

  • tags: #MustRead stopdoinglist pruning subtraction sayingNO

  • Incredible article, masterfully written, about the recent history of math education, with a Japanese and American comparative analysis. Goes into the beauty of lesson study and instructional rounds – job-embedded, contextual, local case study of enhancing professional practice. Deep connections to Jo Boaler’s work. Dan Meyer.

    tags: #MustRead math mathematics matheducation Lesson study Instructional_Rounds

    • where Matsuyama taught, he turned his classroom into a kind of laboratory, concocting and trying out new teaching ideas.
    • Instead of having students memorize and then practice endless lists of equations — which Takahashi remembered from his own days in school — Matsuyama taught his college students to encourage passionate discussions among children so they would come to uncover math’s procedures, properties and proofs for themselves.
    • The Americans might have invented the world’s best methods for teaching math to children, but it was difficult to find anyone actually using them.
    • In fact, efforts to introduce a better way of teaching math stretch back to the 1800s. The story is the same every time: a big, excited push, followed by mass confusion and then a return to conventional practices.
    • The trouble always starts when teachers are told to put innovative ideas into practice without much guidance on how to do it.
    • But our innumeracy isn’t inevitable. In the 1970s and the 1980s, cognitive scientists studied a population known as the unschooled, people with little or no formal education. Observing workers at a Baltimore dairy factory in the ‘80s, the psychologist Sylvia Scribner noted that even basic tasks required an extensive amount of math. For instance, many of the workers charged with loading quarts and gallons of milk into crates had no more than a sixth-grade education. But they were able to do math, in order to assemble their loads efficiently, that was “equivalent to shifting between different base systems of numbers.” Throughout these mental calculations, errors were “virtually nonexistent.” And yet when these workers were out sick and the dairy’s better-educated office workers filled in for them, productivity declined.
      • Fascinating paragraph about learning in context and the power of applied use to deepen one’s understanding of subject area or discipline. Argument for real-world context and PBL approach.
    • The cognitive-science research suggested a startling cause of Americans’ innumeracy: school.
    • How could you teach math in school that mirrors the way children learn it in the world?
    • She knew there must be a way to tap into what students already understood and then build on it. In her classroom, she replaced “I, We, You” with a structure you might call “You, Y’all, We.” Rather than starting each lesson by introducing the main idea to be learned that day, she assigned a single “problem of the day,” designed to let students struggle toward it — first on their own (You), then in peer groups (Y’all) and finally as a whole class (We). The result was a process that replaced answer-getting with what Lampert called sense-making.
    • Consequently, the most powerful influence on teachers is the one most beyond our control. The sociologist Dan Lortie calls the phenomenon the apprenticeship of observation. Teachers learn to teach primarily by recalling their memories of having been taught, an average of 13,000 hours of instruction over a typical childhood. The apprenticeship of observation exacerbates what the education scholar Suzanne Wilson calls education reform’s double bind. The very people who embody the problem — teachers — are also the ones charged with solving it.
    • Left to their own devices, teachers are once again trying to incorporate new ideas into old scripts, often botching them in the process.
    • When Akihiko Takahashi arrived in America, he was surprised to find how rarely teachers discussed their teaching methods. A year after he got to Chicago, he went to a one-day conference of teachers and mathematicians and was perplexed by the fact that the gathering occurred only twice a year. In Japan, meetings between math-education professors and teachers happened as a matter of course, even before the new American ideas arrived. More distressing to Takahashi was that American teachers had almost no opportunities to watch one another teach.
    • In Japan, teachers had always depended on jugyokenkyu, which translates literally as “lesson study,” a set of practices that Japanese teachers use to hone their craft. A teacher first plans lessons, then teaches in front of an audience of students and other teachers along with at least one university observer. Then the observers talk with the teacher about what has just taken place. Each public lesson poses a hypothesis, a new idea about how to help children learn. And each discussion offers a chance to determine whether it worked. Without jugyokenkyu, it was no wonder the American teachers’ work fell short of the model set by their best thinkers.
    • The best discussions were the most microscopic, minute-by-minute recollections of what had occurred, with commentary.
    • Of all the lessons Japan has to offer the United States, the most important might be the belief in patience and the possibility of change. Japan, after all, was able to shift a country full of teachers to a new approach. Telling me his story, Kurita quoted what he described as an old Japanese saying about perseverance: “Sit on a stone for three years to accomplish anything.”
    • To cure our innumeracy, we will have to accept that the traditional approach we take to teaching math — the one that can be mind-numbing, but also comfortingly familiar — does not work. We will have to come to see math not as a list of rules to be memorized but as a way of looking at the world that really makes sense.
  • What’s your brand? Your mark as an educator? HT @GeoMouldey

    tags: #MustRead

  • Old paradigm vs New paradigm professional learning. Episodic and siloed vs embedded and contextual.

    HT @romathio

    tags: professional development PLC professional learning #MustRead

Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

#MustRead Shares (weekly)

  • tags: #mustread research Research-and-Development

  • Great resource for evidence-based reasons why we are emphasizing observation and awareness as a means to discover and launch project ideas. #Mindfulness (+ Innovators DNA!)

    How to Think Like Sherlock Holmes http://t.co/TAwUWh6uyw @boadams1 @ChipHouston1976 @katiejcain HT @MarieGraham

    tags: mindfulness engagement attention #MustRead decisionmaking inquiry observation

    • Sherlock Holmes’s methodology to develop the habits of mind that will allow us to mindfully engage the world.
    • Holmes has a step up on most people. “For most of his life, he had been honing a method of mindful interaction with the world.”
    • “Powers of observation can be developed by cultivating the habit of watching things with an active, enquiring mind. It is no exaggeration to say that well developed habits of observation are more important in research than large accumulations of academic learning.” — W. I. B. Beveridge in The Art of Scientific Investigation
    • “A fool takes in all the lumber of every sort that he comes across, so that the knowledge which might be useful to him gets crowded out, or at best is jumbled up with a lot of other things, so that he has a difficulty in laying his hands upon it. Now the skillful workman is very careful indeed as to what he takes into his brain-attic.”
    • And the models have to come from multiple disciplines because all the wisdom of the world is not to be found in one little academic department.
    • Training in observation follows the same principles as training in any activity. At first one must do things consciously and laboriously, but with practice the activities gradually become automatic and unconscious and a habit is established.
  • tags: feedback #MustRead

  • Applying the 6 traits that make for sticky ideas to the field of teaching. Simple. Unexpected. Concrete. Credible. Emotional. Story. I particularly appreciate the power of #curiosity in using mystery to leverage the stickiness of the “unexpected.” [Disclaimer: I love the Heath Bros. work. Really love it.] I’m not sure how I feel about some of the traditional sit-n-get examples or justifications and using “Made-to-Stick” ideas simply to make questionable pedagogy seem more palatable.

    tags: teaching made_to_stick ideas heathbros #MustRead

Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

#MustRead Shares (weekly)

Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

#MustRead Shares (weekly)

Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

#MustRead Shares (weekly)

  • tags: Interest-based PBL #MustRead interdisciplinary transdisciplinary innovation inquiry

  • Why do we exist?
    How do we behave?
    What do we do?
    How will we succeed?
    What is most important–right now?
    Who must do what?

    tags: culture onboarding organization lencioni #MustRead

  • I think my friend @SteveG_TLC does a GREAT job of showing how #Curiosity and #Story can be the path drivers for learning – as opposed to the traditional-school path driver of “subject area knowledge.” In this video, Steve demos how curiosity about a profile – “the Bionic Chef” can spur learning about bioengineering, geography, heathcare, psychology, etc. And this pursuit was catalyzed by a project called The Flying Classroom, created by Barrington Irving. If you are interested in seeing other ways to organize and catalyze paths of learning, @SteveG_TLC’s Google Earth videos are a super way to explore possibilities.

    tags: PBL inquiry-based #MustRead google earth FlyingClassroom Bionic Chef

  • http://t.co/psgz7I8lun @jbrettjacobsen @scitechyEDU @GrantLichtman @Learn21Tech @boadams1 fantastic resource for you Design peeps!

    HT @dmonaco

    tags: creativity failure success mastery #MustRead mindset

    • In the archers’ doggedness Lewis finds the central distinction that serves as a backbone of her book — far more important than success (hitting the bull’s-eye) is the attainment of mastery (“knowing it means nothing if you can’t do it again and again”), and in bridging the former with the latter lives the substance of true achievement. (The distinction isn’t unlike what psychologist Carol Dweck found in her pioneering work on the difference between “fixed” and “growth” mindsets.) Lewis writes:
    • Mastery requires endurance. Mastery, a word we don’t use often, is not the equivalent of what we might consider its cognate — perfectionism — an inhuman aim motivated by a concern with how others view us. Mastery is also not the same as success — an event-based victory based on a peak point, a punctuated moment in time. Mastery is not merely a commitment to a goal, but to a curved-line, constant pursuit.
    • One essential element of understanding the value of failure is the notion of the “deliberate incomplete.”
    • There is an inevitable incompletion that comes with mastery.
    • Masters are not experts because they take a subject to its conceptual end. They are masters because they realize that there isn’t one.
    • People driven by a pursuit that puts them on the edges are often not on the periphery, but on the frontier, testing the limits of what it is possible to withstand and discover.
    • the opposite of failure, which may not be success—that momentary label affixed to us by others — but reconciliation, aligning our past with an expanded vision that has just come into view.
    • we choose how we designate and how we relate to our own experience, and out of that choice, especially amidst tribulation, springs our capacity for triumph

Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.