-
-
In thinking about what we’ll need from our future leaders, executives have come to realize that the ability to innovate will be one of the foremost qualities–that is, the ability to quickly identify solutions for problems, many of which don’t even exist yet.
-
To paraphrase President Barack Obama: Innovation is our ticket to success in the future.
-
When we started to design the program, we realized that it would need to be much more than about designing cool stuff; it would have to involve developing empathy.
-
1. Leverage children’s existing creativity
-
The trick in creating the Innovation badge curriculum was to strike a good balance between providing suggestions and letting the girls’ inner interests guide them. Rather than dictating the right way to develop new ideas and businesses, the Innovation badges let the girls choose among three options at each step, encouraging them to work on something they’re passionate about. This way, they can customize their own program to match their unique interests and style.
-
2. Train hybrid thinkers
-
3. Build empathy before solutions
-
4. Enable great storytellers
-
5. Get feedback early and often
-
-
12 Questions To Promote Self-Knowledge In Students
HT @therealjamcam
-
School of Rock | The Life of Pinya
Inspiring insight on PBL, from the blog of a high school sophomore.
Project Idea #1: Establish a true three-part government in school. Live the democracy.
How serious are we – U.S. schools and educators – about educating citizens for our American democracy?
How many of our schools allow for, or even promote, student governments that model and mirror the three-part system of our governmental system?
Imagine a high school that elected two senators for each grade level. Imagine that high school electing representatives for each grade level, based on population of the grade level. Or perhaps advisories or homerooms could provide for the “state” structure to mimic.
What if there were a true judiciary of the student body, elected and appointed just in the same mechanisms as our U.S., state, and municipal judiciaries?
What if there were a true executive branch of the student government, elected and empowered in the same manner and mechanism as our President, governors, and mayors?
Imagine that such a system started in elementary school, progressed through middle school, and culminated in high school.
Over the years, how might our democratic citizenship be “practiced” in the ways of leading and participating in our civic structure and responsibilities?
Imagine a student or group of students who became so passionate about such an idea that they made it happen. Image if they lived the lessons they are being taught in U.S. History and Government classes.
What system of government are students actually practicing in school? Is it a representative democracy? Is it a relative dictatorship? I wonder what that’s teaching them over 13 years.
What if they lived and practiced the system that we want them to take responsibility for? What if we operated school in the ways that would more authentically educate a citizen of our democracy?
Imagine. Make happen. What are the possibilities?
=====
I am thinking of writing a series of blog posts about project ideas that could happen within a school – projects that could both transform school and, ultimately, transform us beyond school. This is my first prototype. I’d love to know what you think.
#MustRead Shares (weekly)
The driver and the passengers. Is school driver’s ed or passenger’s ed?
When traveling in a car, who tends to learn the routes better? The driver or the passengers? Who better internalizes the paths and roads and mental maps of the journey?
It’s an interesting metaphor for schools, isn’t it? If we say we want children to be and become deep learners who internalize the cognitive and social skills and knowledge to direct their own paths and journeys later, then how much are we willing to commit to letting them be the drivers more often?
While it’s certainly not always the case, I’ve found that subject-area organization of school – the traditional math, then English, then science classes for a little less than an hour each – tend to be driven by the teachers, and the student-learners are more the passengers.
If you want to test that assumption, then ask a K-12 student to describe to you what they will be doing and studying during an upcoming day or week of school. Then ask them who decided on that plan – that route.
Yet, in project-point-of-origin settings, where the learners launch projects based on their curiosities, interests, wonderings, and passions, the students tend to be in the drivers’ seats, and the teachers can become more like navigational passengers (not backseat drivers!) on the journey.
Who are you letting drive the learning? What’s your school’s balance among time for the teachers to drive and time for the students to drive? Whom do you say you want to engage in deep, powerful learning?
So, I can’t help but ask: Do we want school to be more like “Driver’s Ed” or “Passenger’s Ed?”
= = = = =
Inspired by Krista Tippett’s interview with Dr. Adele Diamond.
Related posts on It’s About Learning – search category: “Curiosity”
Two Questions On My Mind – How We Spend Our School Time
For some time, I’ve been contemplating more than a couple of questions. Yet these two keep emerging for me in the past few days and weeks…
- If most life is project-based, is it too much to devote ~10% wk in project-origin in school? (3.5 of 35 hrs.) 2.5 hrs is pass time! ON TWITTER
- Interesting to visit schools July-Aug, and on Sat/Sun. Lots of sports practices. I wonder… why we feel we cannot “practice” academics too ON TWITTER